Build: #2338 was successful Changes by teleivo <teleivo@users.noreply.github.com>
Code commits
openmrs-core
-
teleivo <teleivo@users.noreply.github.com> d5585afd4142a3facb1d12340e0c4588f0db6565
TRUNK-5816 powermock reflect is enough for api tests
to set the OpenmrsConstants for more info refer to
bc4adc1efaa488c889d3fd2ab61f8178b7e704b4- api/pom.xml (version d5585afd4142a3facb1d12340e0c4588f0db6565)
-
teleivo <teleivo@users.noreply.github.com> bc4adc1efaa488c889d3fd2ab61f8178b7e704b4
TRUNK-5816 Do not allow PowerMock tests in api package
since PowerMock does not run on JUnit 5 see
https://github.com/powermock/powermock/issues/929
we should prevent new contributions from adding tests written with
PowerMock
We still rely on powermock-api-mockito2 to set the
public static final String OPENMRS_VERSION
of OpenmrsConstants during testing.
There might also be a way to replace this usage and simply use
reflection. That could be investigated at a later point.
Most importantly for our migration to JUnit 5 is that we prevent JUnit 4
tests (and therefore also PowerMock tests) from entering openmrs-core.
We should in general avoid reaching for services via the static Context
methods since that makes testing in isolation hard. Springs dependency
injection allows us to wonderfully configure our services during testing
and production. This is what we need to leverage instead of static
methods that need PowerMock during testing. This also just hides the
fact that a Service has certain dependencies and is an easy way out in
designing our system.- api/pom.xml (version bc4adc1efaa488c889d3fd2ab61f8178b7e704b4)